Finding Security in a Use Based Grammar and its Applications for Lexical Analysis
Tarnishing the Ideal
Scholars in Press: An interview with Alex Andrason
Scholars in Press: An interview with Alex Andrason
Scholars in Press: An interview with James Tucker
Editor’s note: this interview was originally published March 23rd, 2015.
Scholars in Press: An interview with Bob Bascom
Editor’s note: this interview was originally published March 30th, 2015.
Scholars in Press: An interview with Elizabeth Robar
Editor's note: This interview originally appeared at Old School Script on March 3rd, 2015. Name: Elizabeth Robar Education: MA in OT & MA in NT from Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary; Graduate work with Graduate Institute of Applied Linguistics; ABD from Southern Seminary (changed programmes from LXX > Hebrew, hence Southern > Cambridge); PhD from University of... Continue Reading →
Against Monosemy, pt 6: Using Ruhl (1989) in language description
There are bits to be salvaged from Ruhl (1989), perhaps, but it might be easier to start elsewhere entirely.
Against monosemy, pt 5: The methodological gap
I fully acknowledge there is certainly an appeal for monosemy as a theoretical construct. The ability to schematize all usages or senses within a single abstract sense does indeed simplified and elegant semantic theory. Such a theory is an attractive prospect for all linguists.
Against monosemy, pt 4: Moving Greek letters
Generative grammar has moved on from its old theories about syntax. Can we please do the same with their semantic theories, too?
Against monosemy, pt 3: The ideal speaker-listener
We're getting over the peak and headed toward the end. The practical take away is coming.
