My audience didn’t do a particularly good job participating in the beginning quiz. Next time I’ll need to find some additional incentives.
Cognitive Linguistics
Andrew Keenan continues his investigations…For the rest of the series, see: Tarnishing the Ideal. In this section, I […]
Scholars in Press: An interview with Rachel Aubrey
Scholars in Press: An interview with Alex Andrason
Editor’s note: this interview was originally published March 23rd, 2015.
Editor’s note: this interview was originally published March 30th, 2015.
Editor’s note: This interview originally appeared at Old School Script on March 3rd, 2015. Name: Elizabeth Robar Education: […]
There are bits to be salvaged from Ruhl (1989), perhaps, but it might be easier to start elsewhere entirely.
I fully acknowledge there is certainly an appeal for monosemy as a theoretical construct. The ability to schematize all usages or senses within a single abstract sense does indeed simplified and elegant semantic theory. Such a theory is an attractive prospect for all linguists.
Generative grammar has moved on from its old theories about syntax. Can we please do the same with their semantic theories, too?